How can you tell if the pictures are real?


What Happens When Trump Was Charged with Anything in the Real World and How AI Can Reveal Your Face, Hands, and Hands?

In the real world, Trump hasn’t been charged with anything. fake photos of his arrest generated by artificial intelligence have been viewed millions of times.

What can viewers do to tell the difference between fake and real images when they look at them, like what happened in his post?

It’s obvious that the thread tends to focus on the first object described, the various Trump family members, with everything around it often having more flaws, as shown by the images created for the thread. Look outside of the image’s focal point. The rest of the image seems to be an unimportant part.

Even though the newest versions of AI-image tools, like Midjourney (version 5 of which was used for the aforementioned thread) and Stable Diffusion, are making considerable progress, mistakes in the smaller details remain a common sign of fake images. Artificial intelligence does not work in a consistent, natural manner as many artists point out.

The face and the hands of Trump look very convincing, but his body may look contorted, even melted, into a police officer. Even though it’s obvious, it’s possible that the scheme could be able to avoid body parts with more training and refining.

Keep in mind that world leaders, celebrities, social media influencers, and anyone with large quantities of photos circulating online may appear more convincing in deepfaked photos than AI-generated images of people with less of a visible internet presence. “It’s clear that the more famous a person is, the more images the AI has had to learn from,” Higgins said. “So very famous people are rendered extremely well, while less famous people are usually a bit wonky.” It might be worth thinking twice before posting selfies after a fun night out with your friends because of the ability of the algorithm to re-create your face. It is probable that the engines have already taken your image data from the web.

In the run-up to the presidential election in the US, what is the policy on the use of artificial intelligence? The current policy of the social media platform states that you cannot share synthetic, manipulated or out-of-context media that is deceptive or leads to harm. Clarifications, commentary, and posts not intended to deceive viewers are excluded from the exceptions.

Just a few years ago, it was almost unfathomable that the average person would soon be able to fabricate photorealistic deepfakes of world leaders at home. As artificial intelligence becomes harder to distinguish from real life, social media platforms may need to reexamine their approach to synthetic content and trying to find ways to guide users through the world of generative artificial intelligence.

Trump denies wrongdoing and accusing the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder of being a degenerate psychopath hates the USA

Positing the idea of violent retribution into the echo chamber of his Truth Social platform early Friday, Trump said it is “known that potential death & destruction” that would be “catastrophic for our Country” would result if a charge is brought against him.

The country is at risk from Trump’s reappearance as a third-time presidential candidate, and as a potential lawsuit, threatening to pull it back into his reality. Trump has not been formally charged with any crime and denies all wrongdoing.

Compare the lived reality where people interact in peace to the fake world that’s on social media.

A methodical criminal case is required when prosecutors are trying to indict a person. Trump says that everything is part of a plot against him.

In a post Thursday, Trump went into all caps – the typographical equivalent of screaming – to declare his innocence and add, “OUR COUNTRY IS BEING DESTROYED, AS THEY TELL US TO BE PEACEFUL.”

The threats places new pressure on the Manhattan District Attorney who has already been threatened by Republicans with an investigation. Without naming Bragg in the Friday post, Trump said anyone who would charge him with a crime is “a degenerate psychopath that truely (sic) hates the USA!”

CNN’s Brynn Gingras and Kara Scannell reported Friday that Bragg’s office received a package containing a white powder substance and a threatening note. They added that while authorities determined there was no dangerous substance, the package capped off a week where law enforcement has seen continual threats against the court, including several bomb threats, all of which turned out to be unfounded.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/25/politics/ai-trump-what-matters/index.html

Bellingcat fed Trump: what he didn’t say during his campaign to defend the marineny group, Navalny and other crimes

Meanwhile, rather than condemn Trump’s latest post, top Republicans in Washington like House Speaker Kevin McCarthy refused to answer questions about it.

Bellingcat, ironically, uses social media posts and other digital data to prove facts, uncovering crimes and investigating atrocities. CNN worked with Bellingcat, for instance, to uncover the Russian operatives who apparently tried to poison the now-jailed dissident leader Alexey Navalny. The group used social media to track down war crimes.

The fake photos, while requiring a double take, were clearly not real. It is that first impression which can show up as misleading. They fed Trump’s narrative of persecution, a visual manifestation of the drama he puts into his posts.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/25/politics/ai-trump-what-matters/index.html

Do Artificial Intelligence and Black Holes Really Exist in the Internet age? Donie O’ Sullivan’s Story of the Liar’s Dividend

Donie O’ Sullivan of CNN had an article about the power of audio generated by artificial intelligence. In addition to magically mimicking Anderson Cooper, he used an AI generator to call his parents. The computer sounded like his voice, but it was not O’Sullivan talking. His mother later stated that the Irish accent felt off during the conversation, but she did not see it in real time.

“When we enter this world where anything can be fake – any image, any audio, any video, any piece of text, nothing has to be real – we have what’s called the liar’s dividend, which is anybody can deny reality,” Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley’s School of Information, told O’Sullivan.

Many women’s faces have been deepfaked, without their consent, onto pornography if they were not tricked into doing so.

A fake story can influence the real world if it’s repeated online enough. That is what happened on January 6, 2021 when conspiracy theories started spreading online and eventually became an attack on the Capitol.

“There is no online and offline world; there’s one world, and it’s fully integrated,” Farid told O’Sullivan with regard to the potential for AI to create a false reality online that bleeds into the real world.

“When things happen on the internet, they have real implications for individuals, for communities, for societies, for democracies, and I don’t think we as a field have fully come to grips with our responsibility here,” he said.

It’s something to be very cautious of as we look at a period in which a former President, current Candidate, and even a master of social media could face criminal charges.